Scopus vs ISI WOS; Which One?
The competition between two international and multidisciplinary databases, i.e Scopus and WOS, motivated researchers to compare them to identify their similarities and differences.
Researchers who intend to publish their article, look for journals indexed by prestigious indexing companies, like Clarivate Analytics, Elsevier, PubMed, Google Scholar and EBSCO.
Journal Indexing helps maintain the ethics and quality in terms of publication and increase visibility, validity, availability, and readership of a paper.
As discussed in the previous posts, journals can increase their reach and impact by getting their publication “indexed” by one or more leading databases.
To illustrate this, assume that you are buying a car, the seller explains to you the options of having that car, saying it has a safety certificate from a European country or an anti-theft certificate from a prominent company. You make sure that the car manufacturer has received valid certificates for this product.
In case of paper publication process, it is much the same as buying a good car; indexes are the standards and certifications that journals manage to take if they comply with a set of principles and rules applicable to each successful indexing body.
Simply put, index is in fact a standard system that different journals will be able to obtain if they adhere to the standards of that particular index.
For example, the ISI indexing has a set of rules and standards that journals must adhere to. If a journal requests to be indexed on the Clarivate Analytics (formerly called Thomson Reuters), it must comply with these rules and standards.
As you know, there are many indexing bodies to validate a journal, two of which are considered as the most trusted and popular journal indexing agencies referred by almost all researchers, i.e. ISI and Scopus, which index high quality peer-reviewed publications.
ISI Indexing
Thomson Reuters is a Canadian multinational media conglomerate that has a number of sub-sets, one of which is the Web of Science Database (WOS). WOS was originally produced by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and is currently maintained by Clarivate Analytics. WOS journals provide the following indexes: Social Science Citation Index, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded and recently-added Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The articles that are indexed on this database are popularly known as ISI articles. WOS has two types of journals: one with Impact Factor (JCR Journals) and the other without Impact Factor (ISI Listed Journals). You can refer to this link to make sure a magazine is indexed in Thomson Reuters Institute.
Scopus
Scopus is the world’s largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed research literature. It was introduced by Elsevier in 2004 and contains over 20,500 titles from more than 5,000 international publishers.
In total, Scopus has indexed 3,500 scientific journals. Scopus is one of Elsevier’s products and using its information requires subscription and payment.
You can refer to this link to make sure a journal is indexed in Scopus.
Scopus vs. WOS
Features |
WOS (ISI) |
Scopus |
Publisher |
Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters Institute of Scientific Information) |
Elsevier |
Number of journals |
>13,000 |
>20,000 |
Content |
Natural sciences, biomedical sciences, engineering, social sciences, arts & humanities. Strongest coverage of natural sciences & engineering. |
Biomedical sciences, natural sciences, engineering, social sciences, arts & humanities. Strongest coverage of biomedical & natural sciences and engineering. |
Databases covered
|
Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Arts & Humanities | 100% of Medline and Embase-plus other content |
Time period covered |
Science component: 1990- Social science component: 1975 Arts & humanities component: 1975- |
Initially covered 1996-present. Now includes substantial content prior to 1996, with some back to 1823. |
Updating frequency |
Weekly | Daily |
Citation analysis |
Yes, including citation tracking, citation counts, and author h-index calculations |
Yes, including citation tracking, citation counts, and author h-index calculations |
Controlled
vocabulary |
No |
No Scopus-specific controlled vocabulary. Keyword field includes indexing terms for references taken from other databases, such as PubMed and Embase |
Export feature for references |
Yes | Yes |
Alerts
feature |
Yes |
Yes |
Relative
strengths |
· More thorough coverage of older literature
· Ability to analyze search results by author, affiliation, country, journal/book title, and broad subject categories. · Can sort search results according to how frequently the articles have been cited. |
· More versatile search and refine options, including ability to search for “first author” · Tools for analyzing search results by author, affiliation, country, journal title, and broad subject categories. · Scopus Author Identifiers are broadly assigned; useful for distinguishing among publications from authors with similar names · Growing book chapter coverage, especially for social sciences and arts & humanities · Can search using controlled vocabulary terms |
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318258303_COMPARISON_BETWEEN_SCOPUS_ISI_WEB_OF_SCIENCE
Conclusion
As a conclusion, there are no definite criteria for ranking these two indexing bodies. Both have some advantages over the other. ISI, due to its much longer history and being the only information provider, is still more popular worldwide, however, the scientific progress of some countries is measured by the number of papers published in Scopus.It is also worth noting that journals with very high scientific credibility are usually indexed by both Scopus and WOS.In general, according to Anne-Wil Harzing in her book, “The Publish or Perish”, Scopus provides a higher citation count than ISI, both in the Sciences and in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scopus appears to have a much broader journal coverage for the Social Sciences and Humanities than ISI and hence provides a fairer comparison.However, in ISI academics working in the Sciences have on average 17.5 times as many citations as the academics working in the Social Sciences and Humanities, in Scopus” this difference is reduced to 7.5 times.However, “for the time being Scopus is hindered by its lack of coverage before 1996. This means that for most established academics in the Sciences, Scopus will lead to lower lifetime citation counts than ISI. In the Social Sciences and Humanities, a substantially increased citation count is likely for academics who have published the majority of their highly cited work after 1996,” according to Anne-Wil Harzing.
1 Comment
Like!! Great article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.